Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Salesforce’

Enterprise Solutions Framework for Salesforce

December 8, 2011 Leave a comment

Salesforce has emerged as one of the best cloud solutions for the market and its evolution is quite remarkable. With a new range of feature sets deployed over cloud and the spree of acquisitions that Salesforce has done especially to add more capability to its offering; there has risen a strong need for organizations who have adopted Salesforce to understand, leverage and extract ROI over this rapidly evolving cloud solution.

There are a range of services spanning the entire lifecycle of cloud based CRM adoption using the Salesforce.com platform one can avail from the list of partners. However organizations fall much short of enabling the newest features and obtain the yield of critical benefits. Building these niche services and solutions are undertaken by select Salesforce partners who leverage exiting function sets and take the operability of the cloud to greater depths. We can build comprehensive solutions that drive sales, support through  Collaboration, Social networks, Business intelligence and Knowledge management processes. There are the critical new market solutions that have been framed in the industry to which there is no dynamic solution that has been created.

Almost many organizations find it harrowing to perform, 1. CRM & App Adoption and driving higher ROI, 2. Implementing the new market solutions for the new dynamic business landscape. Many Salesforce implementations suffer from a lack of critical expertise in adopting best practices, packaged solutions.

Have below Salesforce solutions and support framework [Have derived this from ITIL framework; this conjure specifically for Cloud Administration and Management] that can help appreciate the user experience and drive higher utilization of the cloud solution. Have listed the critical areas of operations support & administration where every organization using Salesforce needs to deploy a focus group.

Salesforce Solution and Support Framework

Framework defines a comprehensive solutioning and support stack. We intend to pursue adoption of this framework and thus provide direct value to the market in achieving the elusive 1. Adoption and driving higher ROI, and optimizing for performance 2. New market solutions for the new dynamic business landscape “to be done On Demand”. With a strong Salesforce expertise and solutioning cadence spanning across process management, analytics, interops, migrations, integrations backed by certified applications; the ForceNext as it is branded will deliver the best conjure of expertise in the Services domain.

Solutions Stack for the New Market: On Request mailto:jesu.valiant@csscorp.com

Copyright © 2009-2011 cran.edge/@jesuvaliant @valiantblogs

Advertisements

Strategic Financial Decisions – The Makers & the Breakers

September 16, 2011 Leave a comment

Taking the Shylock route today’s organizations embark on a journey that can directly drag the organization to perilous and disastrous route into a future that offsets the goals and the mission of the Board. The financial charter by process design, rests with the decision of a very few; these few sometimes do not get the pulse of the organization; they constantly vibrate at a frequency that is completely off course the Board and the Business. With the changing trends in the corporate leadership and their approach to profitability, the only line items these leaders  see are bottom line cost reductions, spree of acquisitions & improper integrations, investing into sales & marketing efforts of decade old services, misplaced S&M focus over geographies and services. They are not to be blamed, without any depth in the service LOB of the organization and the technology vertical comprehension skills these decision and their makers drag the organization down and ensure it sputters to an halt like an old blocked rusted carburetor engine.

I want to discuss a few key examples of such perilous decisions and the decision makers that have devastated tall standing organizations. These decisions and the decision makers have collapsed structures and impeded progress in the name of growth and profitability; bringing to the fore their cleaving to traditional business structures and not adopt to the dynamic business environments governing the markets today.

Nortel Networks: Nortel struggled with a string of weak leadership team who huffed and puffed their way through mistake after mistake until Nortel eventually collapsed. They were burdened with billions of dollars in debt after missing out to raise equity and till they became a penny stock. Poor management and governance saw class-action lawsuits that cost it billions of dollars. Nortel made a series of multi-billion dollar acquisitions that were spectacular failures. Causes: Incorrect and out-of-line Financial Decisions by the handful of leaders that devastated the growth Nortel had achieved over the decades.

Air India: Foremost the Public holding of a Commercial enterprise does never survive, except for entities like ISRO where scientists and industry experts rule the roost. As for Air India and Indian Airlines the decision on not to privatize proves costly. The Indian state with its plural and coalition driven political schema cannot in anyway manage to be commercial in the wake of massive industry competition. The rising debts over fuel, airport parking, salaries, maintenance, one does wonder the future course of the organization. Wages account for just 16% of total costs, so the scope for reducing losses through wage or employee reductions is quite small. Blunders aplenty thanks to the Union ministry like the; Air India – Indian merger, Not outsourcing of fringe and support work, severe misuse of perks, corruption driven losses from high places, No industry expert to run the show as bureaucrats and politicians CANNOT run an airline. The purchase of Boeing 777 and 787 Dream-liners far beyond the airlines need is another major factor in this. Recently reports indicate corruption in the sale of assets of the Organization. Causes: Well.. its political state leadership. What more can anyone expect?

The above listed instances clearly highlight the need to have a strategic leadership team that drives business performance and posses great acumen and wisdom. Having taken financial decisions based on traditional and primitive approaches do not help growth in organizations that operate in dynamic business environments, the need of the hour is to have a sane leadership that can rise up and adopt to the changes. In the name of Optimization – Penny Wise Pound Foolish. Whenever the corporate house starts building hurdles for business growth in any form with red tapes lined with laces preaching of optimization; its high time the second level leadership and mid management foresee the conclusion. In the above examples we see that in the dynamic business environments the decisions becoming debacles.

Jesu Valiant – 2011

CRM’s in 2011 – What the Market needs?

April 14, 2011 4 comments

CRM applications have traditionally helped in issue tracking, tasks management, accounts management and have all their product feature appreciations over the decade. All such enhancements have addressed feature extensions and few rare cases of interops with other applications. In today’s scenario the CRM features are being looked at from multiple perspectives with the advent of newer engagement models and transaction channels. The market does have its share of feature packed systems but features have only looked at addressing the legacy use cases and have not looked at widening the visions over next generation market needs and emerging solution areas. With a late awakening we now see an activity spree in the market that does signal that product companies are trying to make the most, by way of new pursuits and with a load of investments.

Here we take a look at ‘What the market needs today?’, the product stacks prescribed by analysts and how they hold good against the needs.

Gartner in its MQ for 2010 lists the following set of product companies.

Leaders & Challengers per GMQ 2010
-Oracle Siebel
-Salesforce
-Microsoft Dynamics
-RightNow
-Pega Systems
-SAP
-Amdocs

Lets see what are the overall Gaps that are abound in these products with regards to the realities and engagements of today and tomorrow.

1. Integrated E-Support:
With high levels of adoption over self service modules and real-time on-line support systems growing in demand, many CRM’s in the market have not the ability to provide an integrated E-Support Module. E-Support will be the set of functions or features that will help in rendering real time support that will be part of the CRM, i.e., an extension. The functionalities does not end with ‘Incident Tracking’, ‘Data Captures’ and ‘Account details’ but goes on to provide a real time engagement console with the transactions being recorded. Features like ‘Create my Case’, ‘Chat now’, ‘Click to Call’, etc are opportunities to be pursued by CRM companies. There however has been few market leaders who have built capabilities on these lines but much of the market needs here remains to be addressed.

2. Process Automations & Management:
Every Product TAC, Sales & Marketing Teams, Engineering & Design Teams, and almost all the functional arms of any product company plays host to a wide variety of processes and procedures around the tracked CRM entries. There are numerous processes that are covered manually with the reports that are extracted from the CRM databases. CRM here typically functions as a storehouse of data and performs case captures, beyond that all processes are manually managed by the varied functional units within and organization. They have Excel based macros that process data outside CRM, they have audit screens done over third party applications, they utilize web based tools to automate other process and work-flows complimenting the data capture done by the ‘expensive’ CRM.
Here is an opportunity to fill the Gap and make available process / work-flow management functionality as part of the CRM to position product as a market differentiator.

3. Social Web Interoperability:
The last couple of years have seen the emergence of Social media, with direct identification of the individual profiles and engagements globally, this new medium demanded immediate attention from all of the enterprises and corporations. In the wake of Facebook, Twitter, third party forums & wikis, Collaboration platforms, there was an immediate need to listen, manage, engage, analyze these data streams that are out there. The negative impact that can be caused due to mis-management of this medium with its virality over comments and posts posed a very high risk proposition. Many CRM’s today fall absolutely short of capabilities to address this widening gap, however there are a few market leaders who have in the past months frantically went on an Acquisition spree or a partnership spree to add this strength. Salesforce & Raidan over Service Cloud 3, Lithium acquisition of Scoutlabs are few of the attempts made to address this gap.

4. Social Analytics:
With much said and more done over Social media on providing tools capable of listening, capturing, monitoring, engaging of conversation over the Social Web and third party portals and forums, there emerges the strong need to analyze these in line with the few key business cases and identify, get insight,  pursue opportunities, [Social Media Analytics features]. This key feature set is not offered by many in the market. There are only a few product based solutions that currently have tried to build capability here, this area is yet to evolve and the critical aspect of providing Business Intelligence over Social Media is an open opportunity for all the CRM’s out there. With the complexities and lack of analytical cases to pursue and render value there is whole lot of ideation and product features that sprout here with no comprehensive solutions. Again a very strong opportunity for CRM product manufacturers to set their pursuit on.

5. Data Reporting & Analytics:
Much of the CRM’s data reporting revolves around volume driven reporting and rule engine based reporting. Across all the CRM’s that are being adopted there exists a huge gap over data analytics and advanced reporting. We have modules on CRM today that provide the advanced users the ability to query the backend data stacks to procure reports and a very low level slice and dice capability. This gap here to run Analytics and Engineer Insightful details is a Grey area. Although the reporting capabilities have matured, the gaps are huge and every CRM user community over all the product pursue a separate MIS and Data analyst functions outside the CRM process. The market will lap up opportunities here and this can be a huge market differentiator for CRM product companies if they address this glaring gap.

6. Integrated Knowledge Solutions:
Based on an analysis performed over enterprise technical support customers, I could see exponentially at least 15% of customers demanding DIY kits – Self help systems for them to drill down into the solutions. There is also the tremendous gap between the product and its relative documentation that can be ‘called upon’ even by agents who work on incidents and tickets. Both for the customer to assist in better adoption of service or product and for the engagement teams to arrive at a solution to help in better and quicker closure the backend process of Knowledge creation, management, references, knowledge pushing, archiving, etc., remains much to be desired even with the market leaders and the challengers. Solutions over this can be a tremendous value.

Jesu Valiant

%d bloggers like this: